logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.05.25 2017고단2945
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 27, 2017, at the entrance of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around 19:55, the Defendant maintained dancing with other males on the second floor of the victim D (Woo 70 years of age) on the ground that he/she had a conflict with the victim with the victim, which led him/her to the upper part of the victim's breast part of the victim's chest, and had the victim go beyond the floor, thereby making the victim go beyond the floor for about 8 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Written statements of D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. According to the CD (Chograph) (Chograph) (hereinafter “Chograph”), the Defendant and the victim had been suffering from the elevator in the building, and had already been suffering from the dispute. ② The victim first left the elevator before the elevator, followed the Defendant’s arms, and almost at the same time the Defendant fright the Defendant’s arms, ③ the victim went out of the building before the elevator, followed the Defendant, followed by the latter, and made a speech to the male who was living behind the latter, ④ the Defendant who was pushed the Defendant in his arms, and the victim sustained the Defendant in his arms, and the victim sustained the Defendant in his arms, and the application of the law applicable to the law applicable to the case where the Defendant was pushed the victim under the circumstance that the victim was pushed the Defendant.

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which led to the instant crime, was the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant has failed to properly die or compensate for the damage.

On the other hand, the defendant is not subject to criminal punishment.

The defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case against the defendant who was sealed by the victim, and the result is important, but the form of violence used is not much serious.

Based on these circumstances, the sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act shall be determined as per the order.

arrow