logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.12.13 2013고단3737
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the representative of D in the original arms-gu C, is an employer who ordinarily employs three workers and carries out artificial fishery.

The Defendant did not pay the total amount of KRW 950,00 in June 13, 2012, which was worked from June 13, 2012 to September 22, 2012, KRW 1,200,00 in July 2012, KRW 450,00 in August 2012, KRW 3,800,000 in September 1, 2012, and KRW 0,000 in total, and KRW 0,00 in 0,00 in September 1, 20, and KRW 0,00 in 0,00 in 0,00 in 0, KRW 80,00 in July 13, 200, KRW 0 in 0,00 in 0, KRW 60 in 0,00 in 20, KRW 30,00 in 20 in 20,00 in 20,00 in 20.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 109(2) of the same Act.

However, according to the trial records, it is recognized that workers E, F, and G have expressed their intent not to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted, so the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow