A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving the NFIS car volume.

1. At around 01:40 on December 1, 2012, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, operated the instant rocketing car in the direction of the flow from the horizontal edge distance in Suwon-si, Pyeong-gu, Suwon-si to the direction of the flow.

At the time, despite the fact that there was a duty of care to carefully examine the situation in such a case with a new wall, the victim C(29 years old, South) was negligent in performing it as it was while neglecting the duty of care, and the victim C(29 years old, South) driving at the time, followed the driver by the vehicle of the above vehicle.

The suspect, by such occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires medical treatment for two weeks prior to the death of the victim, and escaped without taking any measures such as aiding the victim, even though he/she destroyed the damaged vehicle’s repair cost to the extent that it is equivalent to KRW 454,116.

2. On the same day as Paragraph 1, at around 01:45, the Defendant continued to drive the said vehicle and continued to drive the said vehicle along the intersection of the horizontal distance of the Suwon Police Station located in the sphere of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and continued to drive the said vehicle along the three-lane crossing from the border line to the HosiIC, among five-lanes.

At the time, since the FM car driven by the victim E (the age of 34) was a waiting signal signal at the front door, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to properly see the front door and accurately manipulate the brake system and prevent accidents from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded with the same as it was by negligence, and received the following panions of the above Mtz car, and received the front panions of the above Mtz car.

The Defendant’s occupational negligence requires approximately two weeks’ medical treatment to the victim G (the 38 years of age, women) who is a partner of the victim E and the math car.