logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2015.08.12 2015고단471
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 28, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of two million won or more as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the original state support of the Chuncheon District Court as of July 28, 2008, and on March 8, 2013, in the same court, the Defendant was issued a summary order of six million won or more as of the same crime.

On May 18, 2015, at around 21:54, the Defendant driven a c bargaining car while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.083% on the road from the site of the original week to the white secretary distance in the same Dong from the site of the sub-section of the sub-section of the original week to the white secretary in the same Dong.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a Clearning car.

On May 18, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol as set forth in paragraph (1) and proceeded to the left at the right-hand speed from the front-time speed to the front-time apartment.

Since the place is a private-distance intersection where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident by properly observing and operating the signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the left-hand part of the EK7 vehicle driven by the victim D(31 years of age) who was under the direct left-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-out due to the negligence of the breath while under the influence of alcohol as above, with the front-hand part of the EK7 vehicle driven by the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, around two weeks from the victim D and the victim F (year 31) who was on board the said K7, salt and tensions, etc. in need of light treatment, and around two weeks from the victim G (year 32) who was on board the said K7, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D, F and G;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) and an accident report filed against a driver with the driver with the driver with the employer;

1.Each.

arrow