logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.01.30 2014가합11698
보험금
Text

1. The Defendant: 32,479,048 won to Plaintiff A and 5% per annum from November 4, 2012 to January 30, 2015; and

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At around 20:50 on December 18, 2010, Plaintiff A, a wife, was on board Plaintiff B and was driving C rocketing car on the front of the modern department store located in the Goyang-gu Woo-gu dialogue, Seoyang-si. In the event of the occurrence of the accident, Plaintiff A, a car driven by D while driving C rocketing and a car was set to D in his future.

Plaintiff

A coming into the crosswalk in front of Samsung Digital Fran, which is located in the same sular distance in the same sular line, the vehicle was cut off from D, cut off in front of D's front string of the vehicle, laid down a Bosssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss off D, and spits off the front glass of the vehicle.

Accordingly, D was kneee part of Plaintiff A's left side by cutting off the vehicle.

For this reason, the plaintiff A suffered injuries, such as prone knee-man of the left-hand knee.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). B demanded D who caused the said accident to stop, attached D’s knife the knife on the top of the knife of D’s vehicle, and went beyond 4 to 5 meters, and thereby, caused the injury to the left-hand snife, flife, left-hand knife, etc.

B. The progress of the criminal procedure against D was prosecuted as a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) that “A carried a vehicle, which is a dangerous object, and inflicted an injury on the plaintiffs.”

On February 10, 2012, the Ji Government District Court found the Defendant guilty of the Plaintiff’s injury, and sentenced D to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and sentenced Plaintiff B not guilty on the ground that “it is difficult to deem that Plaintiff B was injured by carrying a dangerous object, or that there was an intentional act.”

(2011 Highest 791) The prosecutor and D appealed.

On July 12, 2012, the District Court sentenced D on July 12, 2012, one year and six months of imprisonment, and two years of suspended execution, and the part of the Plaintiff B's injury was acquitted for the same reasons as the judgment of the first instance.

C. Conclusion and content of the insurance contract

arrow