1. On August 14, 2014, the Defendant’s disposition of rejection of an application for permission for trucking transport business filed against the Plaintiff is revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 1, 2002, the Plaintiff, a local owner company, entered into an entrustment contract for trucking transport business with respect to the first 4.5 tons of the modern 4.5 tons of Kash Truck (vehicle number: C, chassis number D, hereinafter “Kash Truck”) which was newly registered under the name B, and entered into the entrustment contract for trucking transport business between E (hereinafter “E”) and E (hereinafter “E”) which is a local owner company, on May 26, 2009.

B. On February 19, 2010, the Plaintiff terminated an entrustment contract for trucking transport business with E on May 26, 2009, and concluded an entrustment contract for trucking transport business with B on the same day, and completed the registration of transfer under B on the same day. After purchasing a truck of 4.5 tons for Korean commercial use (hereinafter “vehicle number”) and changing the vehicle number to C, and completed the new registration of the instant vehicle in the name of B on June 9, 201.

C. Meanwhile, on October 1, 2002, the Plaintiff registered its business with the trade name “B”, but closed business on February 28, 2010. On May 26, 2009, the Plaintiff registered its business with the trade name “E” but corrected that trade name on March 16, 2010 as “B.”

Then, on September 12, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against B against Busan District Court 2013Da70893, the Plaintiff filed a ruling of recommending reconciliation with the purport that “B shall receive money from the Plaintiff under the agreement, such as management expenses, taxes, public charges, and charges, related to the instant vehicle, and at the same time implement the procedure for the registration of transfer of ownership on September 12, 2013 with respect to the instant vehicle” (hereinafter “decision of recommending reconciliation in this case”), and the said ruling of recommending reconciliation was made.