1. The following parts of the instant lawsuit shall be dismissed:

The defendant among the lawsuits filed by the plaintiff and the plaintiff co-litigation intervenor.

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff was a school juristic person established on October 28, 2003, and established the F University on April 8, 2004 (hereinafter “instant university”). The instant university was opened on September 1, 2004.

The plaintiff has established and operated only the university of this case from then to now.

The Intervenor Co-Litigation and the Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “Co-Litigation Intervenor”) entered on March 1, 2005 and graduated on August 31, 2006 from the Co-Litigation Intervenor B, and graduated on August 31, 2007 by entering on March 1, 2006, as the co-litigation and the Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s (hereinafter “Co-Litigation”) and the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Master’s Master’s Degree, which combines two majors of “G” or “H” (hereinafter “H”), and graduated on August 31, 2009 by entering the Co-Litigation and graduated on March 1, 2006.

From October 8, 2012 to November 23, 2012, the Board of Audit and Inspection determined that the university of this case unfairly grants credits and degrees, and that the university of this case commits unlawful acts, such as exaggeration and false disclosure of the results of securing legal teachers, and sent a “written request for disposition of audit and inspection results” to the Ministry of Education.

(Attachment 1) The Ministry of Education received the above request for disposition from the Board of Audit and Inspection, and conducted an on-site investigation on the Plaintiff and the instant university from May 9, 2013 to May 10, 2013. As a result, the Ministry of Education failed to purchase the land at school expense and complete the registration of ownership transfer for four years and five months, and the Ministry of Education failed to report the acquisition of fundamental property for education without a resolution of the board of directors to the competent agency. The fact that the acquisition of basic property for education is not reported to the competent agency, the contribution for the purpose of the development of the school is collected to the corporate accounting without a resolution of the board of directors, and the remaining amount is managed as basic property