Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around 20:00 on August 7, 2020, the Defendant driven a so-called Damp vehicle at C, and driven a gold-line of 2081 at Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, one square distance at the entrance from the shooting distance at the entrance of the entrance to the si-distance.

The location is the intersection where signal lights are installed, and the red signal lights turn on the ongoing lane. On the opposite lane, the victim B(42 cc) is driving in accordance with the victim B(42) No. 100 Obama No. 100, so in this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by complying with the signal.

Nevertheless, even though Defendant neglected to perform the above duty of care and used red signal, the front wheels of the above Orala was just attributable to the negligence of the Defendant, and the front wheels of the above Orala was received as Defendant’s front driver for the passenger car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the above victim by occupational negligence, i.e., the alley of the bridges, without mentioning any mentioning the alley of the Bridges that require approximately 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

A traffic accident report, a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a photographic diagnosis on the scene of an accident after taking a photographic image of the Defendant’s legal statement (B, B, B, B, B, and C, 12 weeks need to be taken).

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses, tea inquiries, investigation reports on mandatory insurance inquiries (Attachment to accident video CDs);

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the crime of this case is committed by the defendant by negligence in violation of the signal and causing serious injury to the victim by shocking the damaged person who is a driver of Ortobane by negligence, and the crime is not highly likely to be committed in light of the circumstances, methods and results of the crime.

However, the defendant is the case.