A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment-Attachment Power] Theft (2012): A fine of 500,000 won (2010): A fine of 100,000 won (1987): A fine of 300,000 won (1987): A fine of 100,000 won (criminal fact) was collected from November 201, in order to make it difficult for the Defendant to collect stolen water while making a living while selling and maintaining his/her livelihood, he/she returned to Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, France, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and tried to confirm the place where other valuables are collected to gather and store water, and to steals it by impairing it.

On May 28, 2015, at around 17:24, 2015, the Defendant intruded the victim's house into the above residence with an open cresh by using the gap in the victim's house in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C victim D's residence, and stolen it with a yellow 20 km equivalent to KRW 50,000, the market price owned by the victim and kept there.

From this point to July 25, 2016, the Defendant habitually stolen solid water equivalent to KRW 879,960 in the market price on eight occasions, as described in the attached list of crimes, and invaded upon the victim’s residence, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation;

1. In a case where a criminal who habitually stolens his/her residence during the daytime as a means of habitually larceny, the evaluation of illegality of the act of housing intrusion during the daytime cannot be deemed as included in the constituent elements evaluation under Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act, in a case where the criminal committed habitual larceny under Article 332, 329, and 319 of the Criminal Act regarding the relevant criminal facts, and Article 2015Do9049 of the Criminal Act regarding the choice of punishment.

Therefore, if a criminal who habitually commits larceny stipulated in Article 332 of the Criminal Code intrudes upon his/her residence as a means of committing the crime during the day, his/her act of intrusion upon his/her residence constitutes a crime of intrusion upon his/her residence separate from habitual larceny.

In addition, the crime of habitual larceny as provided in Article 332 of the Criminal Code.