logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.08 2018고단6292
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 20, 2018, the Defendant received a report from the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C, Yeonsu-gu, on June 14:40, 2018, and received a report from two persons who are not aware of it, and the circumstances leading to the Incheon Yeonsu-gu, Incheon training Police Station D District E, who called the scene, listen to the details of the report from the reporter.

The term “,” and the term “E” assaulted by a bad hand the shoulder part of E once.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Patrols and photographs of patrols;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a crime of interference with the execution of official duties for the reason of sentencing requires strict punishment for a crime that undermines the function of the State by nullifying a legitimate exercise of public authority. However, it is necessary to take into account the following factors as favorable to the Defendant: (a) the primary offender is the Defendant; (b) the Defendant was a minor offender; (c) the Defendant was committing the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant was shoting his mistake in depth while committing the instant crime; and (b) the Defendant’s wife was shoting his wife against the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant’s wife was taking into account the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and means of the crime; and (d) the circumstances after the crime

arrow