beta
Text
1. As to the Korea Commercial Arbitration Board case No. 1411-0107 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
가. 원고는 2013. 11. 22. 피고와 피고가 공연한 뮤지컬(C, 이하 ‘이 사건 공연’이라 한다)의 분장/헤어에 관한 스텝 계약(이하 ‘이 사건 계약’이라 한다)을 체결하였고, 이에 따라 원고는 이 사건 공연 진행에 필요한 분장, 헤어에 수반되는 필요 물품과 재료를 준비하고, 공연기간 동안 3인의 전문 인력을 상주시키며, 이 사건 공연과 관련된 분장, 헤어 업무의 진행, 기술적 인프라 제공 등의 용역을 제공하고 피고로부터 그에 따른 용역대가로 450만 원을 받기로 하였다.
B. The Plaintiff filed an application with the Korea Commercial Arbitration Board for arbitration seeking payment of KRW 1.5 million for the service cost under the instant contract, which was unpaid against the Defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 1411-0107, Jul. 1, 201) and the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (the single arbitrator) made an arbitral award as stated in the attached Form No. 13, Oct. 13, 2014 (hereinafter “instant arbitral award”).
C. The Plaintiff submitted the original copy of the instant arbitral award in this case.
[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry in Gap evidence 1 and 2
2. The enforcement of the arbitral award shall be made by the judgment of execution by the court, and the arbitral award made in the Republic of Korea shall be enforced unless there is any ground under Article 36(2) of the Arbitration Act (Articles 37(1) and 38 of the Arbitration Act). Since there is no ground under Article 36(2) of the Arbitration Act concerning the arbitral award in this case, compulsory execution based on the arbitral award in this case must be permitted.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.