Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant managed a parking lot C in the underground of the Busan Dong-gu B building and processed video information taken by CCTV camera installed in the above parking lot by collecting, holding, searching, printing, providing, or destroying the video information taken by the video information processing device installed in the above parking lot.

No person who has managed or processed personal information shall divulge personal information he/she has become aware of in the course of performing his/her duties or provide it to another person without authority.

Nevertheless, from January 2014 to February 201 of the same year, the Defendant shown video information, including the face, body, and action of the victim DNA taken by the above parking lot CCTV at the above C parking lot office, to E through monitoring at the office.

Accordingly, the defendant, who managed or processed personal information, has divulged personal information of the victim that he became aware of in the course of his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel in the police statement protocol of D on the ground that they shown the video images taken by men and women who could not identify the defendant in an inappropriate manner at the open place and did not divulge personal information. However, the witness E from the investigative agency to this court, stating that "the defendant showed the video images in the judgment of the court in question, so that he could be identified by face and body action, and that the above video was immediately D and F, because he could be identified by face and body action." The above witness made a consistent statement on the background that the video of this case was viewed as the video of this case, the contents of the video, the defendant's attitude, the response of the witness, etc., and the contents thereof are credibility and reasonable, so it can be admitted as evidence, and there was a purpose to prevent the defendant from an inappropriate act as a building manager.

Even above.