logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.09.19 2014고단2297
특정범죄자에대한보호관찰및전자장치부착등에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 21, 2013, the Defendant, who was sentenced by the Seoul High Court to imprisonment for a quasi-indecent act by compulsion, was on January 31, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence.

1. On November 12, 2010, the Defendant violated the Act on Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders, following the decision to order the attachment of an electronic tracking device for five years as well as one year of imprisonment for quasi-indecent act by force in the former District Court’s military support, and the attachment of an electronic tracking device on May 30, 2014.

A person with an electronic device installed shall not arbitrarily separate or damage the electronic device from his/her body during the period of attachment of the electronic device, interfere with its propagation, alter data received, or otherwise impair its utility.

On July 8, 2014, around 04:30 on July 8, 2014, the Defendant maintained the utility of the electronic device by moving approximately 20 minutes of portable tracking devices to the vicinity of the D's house in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government without carrying approximately 20 minutes of portable tracking devices.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, entered the victim’s dwelling by putting the gate opened by the Defendant out of the lower part of the Defendant, and attempted to open a gate underground according to stairs, and invaded the victim’s faces with the kitchen window.

3. The Defendant at the above date and place of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) Haman F, a trainee of on-the-job training belonging to the Seoul Southern Police Station Edistrict, who was called out after receiving a report of 112, tried to view the circumstances of the case, and obstructed the police officer’s criminal investigation and the lawful performance of official duties concerning the duty of sending the report of 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Evidential photographs of each evidence;

1. The suspect shall wear a report of investigation;

arrow