beta
Text
Defendants are not guilty.
Reasons
Defendant B is a North Korean refugee who is employed as a temporary accounting position in a mutual incompeting company, and A is a "E company" worker in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a Chinese shipbuilding unit.
Defendant
B For the purpose of acquisition of nationality and long-term stay in the form of a disguised marriage by receiving money from a Chinese Joseon Party A whose period of domestic stay is limited, the Defendants conspired with each other on August 17, 201, and the Dongdaemun-gu Office public service center of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul around August 17, 201, stated the false facts that the Defendant A, such as the Defendant B, was married in each column of the marriage registration statement as if the marriage was duly completed, although there was no genuine marriage, and the Defendant B submitted to the public official in charge of the family register at the same place to enter false information in the family registration information system, which is the same special media as the authentic copy of the authentic deed, thereby making the said public official know of the fact enter false information in the public electronic record.
After all, the Defendants filed a false report to a public official and made him enter false facts in the computerized records of family relationship registration, which is a public electronic record, and exercised a false public electronic record by allowing a public official to store and operate the family relationship registration computer records in tin.
Judgment
According to the evidence adopted by this court, the defendants prepared a marriage report at the public service center of Dongdaemun-gu Office on August 17, 201 and reported the marriage to the public official in charge of family register, and the public official in charge of family register entered the marriage of the defendants in the family registration information system, and stored the above information in the family registration computer record, respectively.
However, as long as the Defendants did not have a genuine intention to marry, whether the above-mentioned marriage report was made or not is recorded in the Health Team and the evidence list.