logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.04.26 2018누71511
특정 건축물 사용 승인 직권 취소처분 취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The argument that the defendant cited in the judgment of the court of first instance was not significantly different from the argument that the defendant made in the court of first instance, and even after examining the defendant's argument together with the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance, the judgment of the court of first instance that the necessity of public interest to revoke ex officio the approval of the use of this case is not so significant to justify the disadvantage that

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case should be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is justified on the grounds of its conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow