1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;

2. 2,500,000 won shall be collected from the defendant.

3. The above additional collection charge.

Punishment of the crime

From August 2016 to February 2017, the Defendant advertised Ctel B 1014 of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Officetel B from around August 2016, and arranged sexual traffic by advertising business places on the Internet website, employing sexual traffic women, notifying the location and the head of the office of the above officetels if male customers contact with them, and receiving KRW 10,000 won in return for similarity from male customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or E;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act (including cases);

2. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Additional Collection (the amount of collection shall be based on the statement made by the defendant to the prosecution).

3. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

1. Recommendation and sentence of the sentencing guidelines: Advertisement activities or brokerage activities using a medium with high propagation (one year to three years) in the aggravated area (one year), two types of sexual traffic crimes subject to age or older (one year to three years), such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (referring to brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic by business, giving and receiving compensation, etc.).

1. Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant committed a crime during the period of probation;

1. favorable circumstances: Taking into account all kinds of sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that the defendant shows an attitude against him/her when he/she misleads him/her, the fact that he/she has no previous record of the same kind of crime, etc. (to deviate from the lowest limit of the sentencing guidelines in consideration of the above favorable circumstances);