Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On September 23, 2017, at around 12:40 on September 23, 2017, the Defendant used the victim F (56 years of age) to conduct a flat work on the land owned by the Defendant using the victim F (56 years of age) snick, and used the victim F’s snick, in the process of disputing the dispute by hand, the Defendant used the victim’s snick snick, and used the victim G (59 years of age)’s snick snick, which had been witnessed and at the site of this light.
2. Determination may not be charged against the express intent of the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Code as an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Code.
On September 13, 2018, after the institution of the instant prosecution, the victims withdrawn their wish to punish the Defendant on the second hearing date of the instant case.
Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.