A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in Busan District Court's Dong Branch Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 29, 2016.

[2014 Highest 2344]

1. On March 5, 2014, the Defendant of the crime committed around March 5, 2014, at a soup restaurant, where it is impossible to know the trade name in the Dondong-dong, Busan, the Defendant, around March 5, 2014, repaid KRW 12 million to the victim D within one month.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the Defendant, without any particular property at the time, was liable to pay approximately KRW 1.50 million, and was thought to be used to repay the existing debts owed by the Defendant for most of the damages, and there was no intention or ability to pay the said money to the victim within a month because the business was not operated well.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 1,1280,000 won to the Saemaul Treasury account of the defendant on the same day as the loan money from the victim.

2. On March 17, 2014, the Defendant of the crime committed around March 17, 2014, if he/she was unable to know the trade name in the Suwon-dong, Busan on March 17, 2014, and he/she borrowed only KRW 20 million as he/she requires money for business in the coffee shop.

It will provide a contract for the lease of real estate in a factory which is inside and outside of the security.

The lease deposit is worth at least KRW 90 million because it has been invested in the facilities equivalent to KRW 90 million in fact.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant, without any particular property at the time, was liable for approximately KRW 1,50,000,000, and was thought to be used to repay the existing debts owed by the Defendant for most of the money borrowed from the injured party, and the deposit was deducted in full due to the failure to pay rent to the above factory and the case was instituted from the lessor. Therefore, the above lease agreement is virtually valid.