logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.02.19 2019고단6256
협박
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: “The defendant's office operated by the defendant in Cheongdo-gun B around May 28, 2019 shall be telephoneed to the victim E, who is the head of the publicity team of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and ① to the damaged company on the ground of the members of the National Assembly, the ratio of the damaged company shall be wide.

(Pipe pipes managed by the injured company) The claims for disclosure of information on investment resources have been made, and there have been many kinds of misuses and misuses, and the forgery of public documents has been made up;

He/she shall return it to Gamama after being recovered from the Republic of Korea on the first day.

The injured company is not capable of dealing with it.

It would be possible for the injured company to respond to the absence of (in the case of us).

B. The organization associated with the corruption of the damaged company will be incorporated.

2. The term “victims” refers to “victims,” and the term “victims,” was the head of the public relations team of the victimized Company, and the term was the head of the public relations team of the victimized Company, and the term was able to prevent the Daegu Broadcasting Station.

Furthermore, the other Doese of the person who is aware of how or not the damaged company has used its investment resources erroneously, or who knows the information to B, is the victim;

The part is how the injured company was punished by filing a criminal complaint against him or her or her or her in the past, and as if there was no objection to the company's business, the injured company and the victim were threatened with the purpose of retaliation against the provision of investigation orders, such as the victim's criminal investigation and trial related to his or her past criminal case investigation and trial.

"To this end, this is a crime falling under Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Code, which cannot be discussed against the victim's express will under Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Code. According to the agreement which is bound in the trial records, the victim company and the victim E.

arrow