A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

Punishment of the crime

On December 4, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Busan District Court on May 1, 2008, and on May 1, 2008, the same court was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for the commission of a forged official document, and was released on January 29, 2010 during the execution of each of the above sentence on April 14, 2010 and completed the execution of the sentence.

On March 22, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 30, 2017. On August 11, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the same court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 11, 2017.

On November 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at a trade infinite office located in Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant: (b) purchased a site to operate a secondhand water; (c) purchased a secondhand site and did not operate a secondhand water; (d) purchased a corporation; and (e) purchased a secondhand water site; and (e) made a business defect; and (e) made a secondhand money upon the closure of a corporation after obtaining a loan from a corporation under the name of the corporation; and (e) may impose money for business damage.

On the other hand, it was false to the effect that the corporation's acquisition fund is required, and that it would be sold again after purchasing a car, and that it would make the cost of receiving a loan by credit card.

However, in fact, the Defendant had no special property at the time, there was no certain occupation or income, and there was no high-quality credit rating as 10 grade, and there was no legal entity to accept the legal entity, and there was no experience in accepting the legal entity, and there was thought to use the money from the victim for personal purposes, such as living expenses, so even if receiving the money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to allow the legal entity to take over the legal entity and conduct the business.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim and deceivings the victim for the expenses of taking over the corporation from the victim.