logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2020.09.23 2020고단698
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

(Criminal) On March 18, 201, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Incheon District Court on March 18, 201, on November 30, 2011, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Central District Court on November 30, 201, and on January 16, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 2,50,000 to a suspended sentence of eight

(Criminal Facts)

1. Around 19:00 on April 25, 2020, the Defendant driven a Bnish-do car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.047% from the 1km section to the front road of the 3-7 acquisition of documents in both documents of Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun, from the road in front of the Donsan Station located in the Donsan-ro 20-ro, Namyang-do, Namyang-gu, Namyang-gu, the Namyang-do.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a passenger car in the No. B.

At around 19:00 on April 25, 2020, the Defendant continued the front road of the transferee-party 3-7, 150 od. 3-7, the acquisition of both documents in Gyeyang-gun, Gyeonggi-do, to the front side of the transferee-party 3-7, from the front side of the middle middle distance.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, there was a duty of care to ensure that drivers are thoroughly engaged in driving at the front time and safely operate the car line.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was in the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was driven by the victim C (Nam, 59 years old) who was driven by the Defendant due to the negligence beyond the median line while driving a stroke while neglecting this, and was driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the mouth of the left-hand gate, which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow