1. The part of the Plaintiff E, J, and U’s claim for lost income in the instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The Defendant excludes Plaintiff K, L, and M.

Basic Facts

A. The judgment subject to a retrial and the calendar 1) Plaintiff A, E, J, P, U, and AC (hereinafter “the victims of this case”) against the Plaintiffs

The former Constitution of the Republic of Korea (wholly amended by Article 9 of the Constitution of October 27, 1980) after arresting the investigator of the Central Information Department, etc. around January 17, 1974.

I. The Constitution of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “the Constitution”).

2) Emergency measures declared by the President pursuant to Article 53 (hereinafter “Emergency Measures”) are referred to as “Emergency Measures”

(1) On February 7, 1974, the Plaintiff A, E, J, and AC were indicted for violation of subparagraph 1 and was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment and suspension of qualifications, 10 years of imprisonment and 10 years of suspension of qualifications, and 10 years of suspension of qualifications at the Emergency General Military Court Conference on February 7, 1974 (Supreme Court Decision 74 U.S. 3 of the Emergency General Military Court Decision 74 U.S. 1; hereinafter “instant judgment subject to review”).

(2) The victims of this case appealed and appealed on March 1, 1974, but the Emergency High Military Court Decision 74 non-high Military Court Decision 74 non-high Military Court Decision 74Do124 decided August 20, 1974 (Supreme Court Decision 74Do1124 decided). The victims of this case were finally subject to the judgment of retrial No. 1 decided on August 1, 1974 (the Supreme Court Decision 74Do1124 decided). The summary of the crime against the victims of this case was that "the defendants filed a motion to amend the Korean Constitution, recommended the amendment of the Constitution, recommended it to be known to others, and distorted the President's emergency measures at the same time," and the plaintiff P was suspended from the execution of punishment due to the judgment of retrial No. 1 of this case, and was indicted for violating Emergency Decree No. 999 decided August 19, 197 (the Seoul High Court Decision 197Da1979 decided August 19, 197).

Plaintiff

The summary of the criminal facts against P is above.