beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant leased a site F in the original city owned by C, D, E, and Dongbu Ik Island Co., Ltd. in early 201, and decided to operate a business with authorization and permission from the original city, and on March 8, 2011, established G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) around June 8, 201 (the name of the said G company was changed to H around June 8, 201);
피고인은 2011. 4. 1.경부터 같은 달 4.경까지 원주시 등지에서 위 E이 위 H 사업을 위하여 투자한 2억 원을 위 C 명의의 신한은행 계좌로 송금받아 피해자를 위하여 업무상 보관하던 중, 피고인이 사용하던 질부(姪婦) I 명의의 하나은행 계좌로 2011. 10. 13.경 2,850만 원, 같은 해 11. 1.경 3,600만 원을 이체한 후 2011. 12. 초순경 C, D, E이 위 금원을 C 명의의 계좌로 다시 입금하라고 수회 요청하였음에도 2011. 11. 24.자 이행합의서 상 ‘E이 투자한 투자약정금 2억 원을 피고인이 E에게 사업완료 후 전액 상환한다’는 내용에 따라 즉시 반환할 필요가 없다는 이유로 거부하였다.
As a result, the Defendant refused to return the total amount of KRW 64.5 million of the victim's property without any justifiable reason and embezzled.
2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the defendant, D, E, etc. agreed to operate the said H (hereinafter "the instant marina"), and the defendant agreed to take charge of the authorization and permission procedure for the instant marina, and Eul deposited KRW 200 million into the new bank account under the name of D's wife C, such as expenses related to the authorization and permission of the instant marina and site lease deposit, etc. around April 201, and the defendant received the physical card from D, E, etc. from April 201 to November 201, using approximately KRW 95,50,000 from April 200 to November 201, 200 after obtaining understanding from D, E, Defendant, etc.