logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.28 2016가합523885
손해배상(기) 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 20,000,000 with respect thereto to the Plaintiff and the period from February 26, 2016 to April 28, 2017.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is the representative attorney-at-law of “law firm H”, and Defendant B (hereinafter “B”) is a media company that issues E, a comprehensive daily newspaper, and operates E’s website.

Defendant D is a reporter belonging to the second division of society B, who coverage and prepares articles concerning the article of this case as seen below, and Defendant C is a person who instructed and supervised Defendant D with respect to the article of this case as the second division of society in B.

On February 25, 2016, Defendant B posted an article of “G” as “G” (hereinafter “instant article”) on the Social Myeon, and the content thereof is as shown in attached Table 3, and Defendant B posted the article on the Internet homepage (F) as shown in attached Table 4 on the same day.

(2) On February 26, 2016, Defendant B published the article of “J” (hereinafter “the article of this case”) on the Social side of the society as of February 26, 2016. The contents are as shown in attached Table 5, Defendant B posted the article as it is on the Internet homepage (hereinafter “instant article 4”) as of the same day, as shown in attached Table 6. [The ground for recognition] There is no dispute, Party B’s statement in Articles 1 through 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion of the purport of the entire pleadings. The Defendants attempted to adjust the Plaintiff’s assertion of the purport of the first and second articles from the article of this case ① to the client K (LL; hereinafter “L”) of this case in order to receive contingent remuneration, the Plaintiff lent the Plaintiff’s loan of KRW 500 million at the interest rate of the Plaintiff’s capital to the Plaintiff’s representative, and the Plaintiff’s loan of the article of this case and the Plaintiff’s loan of this case (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s loan”).

arrow