The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing of the defendant) is that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflects the depth thereof, that an agreement was reached by paying KRW 600,000 to the victim of property damage by paying KRW 600,000 to the victim, that payment was made to the victim who refused to leave, and that the degree of violence exercised to the police officer obstructing the performance of official duties was relatively minor, and that the defendant is currently living faithfully even for the young children in the third grade of high school (eight months of imprisonment).

2. In the investigation stage, the fact that the defendant paid KRW 600,00 to the victim of property damage and expressed his/her intention not to prosecute the defendant, that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and that there appears to be a misunderstanding, such as submitting late reflectors after the defendant was detained, etc., are favorable to the defendant.

However, during the period of repeated crime, the Defendant was indicted of committing a crime of destroying property while she was frightening up with “the persons next to the Defendant,” and she was charged with committing a crime of destroying property at a place of business during the period of repeated crime. However, even if she was indicted of a female business owner, she was refused to demand the said female business owner to do so, and again she committed a crime of refusing to leave while she followed again, and committed a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties by exercising an uneasible violence against the police officer dispatched to the scene, which is not very heavy, and the nature of such crime is not good.

In addition, the circumstances after the crime are extremely poor, such as refusing to sign and seal a protocol, when the defendant was arrested as a police officer immediately after the crime of destroying property was committed and the defendant was arrested as a current offender, and the police is investigated as a result of the crime of refusing to leave the protocol and obstructing the performance of official duties, and there are many criminal offenses against the defendant.