The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is unfair because the punishment (3 million won) of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on favorable sentencing grounds such as the defendant's confession of the crime, the fact that there is no record of punishment, the agreement with the victim, and the fact that the victim's after-sale seems not to be significant. However, the victim's scambling out three suspensions and scambling out the victim's scambling, etc. However, in full view of the reasons for unfavorable sentencing, such as the defendant's age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the crime, and all other matters pertaining to the sentencing as indicated in the records and changes in the records of this case, the judgment of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and there is no change in circumstances to be further considered in the trial (the victim's intention not to punish is already reflected in the sentencing of the court below). The defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (the court below applied the main sentence of Article 62 of the Juvenile Act at the time of the judgment, and did not sentence detention in the workhouse because the defendant was under 18 years of age, and only the defendant appealed, so the court below did not sentence detention in the workhouse in accordance with the principle of prohibition