logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.07.23 2015나2192
사해행위취소등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s claim for reimbursement against B 1) D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”).

A) On April 20, 201, 201, scars Electronic Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Scars Electronic”) (hereinafter “Scars Electronic”)

(2) Around May 16, 201, when entering into a contract for the supply and transfer of technology with scarcitys for 440,000,000 won as advance payment, D entered into an insurance contract with the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Seoul Guarantee Insurance”) with the coverage amounting to 440,000,000 won, insurance premium amounting to 20,05,30 won, insurance premium amounting to 205,30, and insurance period from May 16, 2011 to December 31, 2013, the insurance period of which was from May 16, 201 to December 31, 2013; and at the time the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd, agreed to reimburse the above payment insurance amount to the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd.; and the Plaintiff and B, Erash, G, and D’s joint and several surety obligation to compensate.

3) On October 9, 2012, Scar Electronic filed a claim for insurance proceeds on the ground of D’s nonperformance of obligation with the Seoul Guarantee Insurance, and the Seoul Guarantee Insurance paid KRW 440,000,000 insurance proceeds to Scar Electronic on November 1, 2012, and D paid KRW 98,826,220 to the Seoul Guarantee Insurance around November 17, 2012. 4) The Plaintiff paid the Seoul Guarantee Insurance amount of KRW 361,221,280 remaining indemnity for D’s Seoul Guarantee Insurance from January 1, 2013 to May 15, 2013.

B. On July 9, 2013, B made a provisional registration of the right to claim ownership transfer (hereinafter “the provisional registration of this case”) on the instant real estate, which is its sole property, to the Defendant, who is the birth partner, on February 21, 2011.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Entrys at Gap's 1 to 4 and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The time of entering into a trade reservation, which is the cause of the provisional registration of the instant case (hereinafter “instant trade reservation”).

(a) the point at which the parties’ assertion was entered into the instant trade reservation.

arrow