Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On January 18, 2018, the Defendant was a person engaged in driving Dastren R2.0 car, and operated the said car at around 08:35 on January 18, 2018, and led to turn to the left at a speed of about 20 km at the speed of about 884-15 square meters for the Crost apartment, which is located at the speed of 8844-15, e.g., the Crost apartment at the top of the Crost apartment.

Since a crosswalk is installed, in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to temporarily stop the motor vehicle in front and safely drive the motor vehicle so as not to obstruct the passage of the motor vehicle and prevent the accident from being interfered with the traffic of the motor vehicle, if there is a pedestrian crossing.

Nevertheless, by negligence, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care, and committed so far, the Defendant got off the right side of the Victim E (A, 86 years old), which was crossinged to the right side on the left side by using the marina crossing. The Defendant got off the right side of the victim E (A, 86 years old) as the front part of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, by negligence in the above business, such as influoring and closing the details between the 12 week period of masse, which require approximately 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports (1), (2) on traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the statement protocol to E;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is sufficient to consider the injury that requires a considerable period of treatment to the victim as disadvantageous circumstances. The fact that the victim is dead and reflects, the fact that the victim is subscribed to a comprehensive insurance, the agreement with the victim, and the first offender who has no criminal history is favorable.