Text
The judgment of the first instance court, including the counterclaim claim of the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) that was reduced in the trial, shall be modified as follows.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The pertinent Defendant, on May 17, 2012, is a person subject to the implementation of Lposc and soft approach (hereinafter “instant treatment”) by both arms in the D Hospital located in Songpa-gu Seoul High Court (hereinafter “Plaintiff Hospital”).
The plaintiff is a doctor who directly treated the defendant and conducts the instant treatment, and operates the plaintiff hospital.
On May 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was admitted to the Plaintiff Hospital and was consulted with the Plaintiff on the instant procedure; and (b) was conducted blood and chest X-ray tests.
피고는 이 사건 시술을 받고자 2012. 5. 17.(이하 같은 날 발생한 일에 대하여는 날짜 기재를 생략하고 시간만으로 표시한다) 10:21경 외래를 통해 원고 병원에 입원하였으며, 원고는 12:15경부터 14:10경까지 전신마취 하에 피고의 양쪽 액와부(腋窩部, 겨드랑이)를 절개한 후 TLA 용액을 투입하여 1,000cc 가량의 지방을 흡입하고 늘어진 팔 부위를 들어 올리는 시술(arm lift)을 한 다음 절개 부위를 봉합하는 이 사건 시술을 시행하였다.
After the procedure of this case, the Plaintiff prescribed a drug (patidine, catus) that could mitigate each of the symptoms when the Defendant complained of the 14:40 identification cards and the nausea around 14:57.
Plaintiff
The hospital medical personnel still complained of the pains of the clinic on May 18, 2012 at around 08:00, and at around 11:00, the hospital medical personnel removed the beer, after removing the beer, and then implemented the ice factoring to the defendant.
On May 19, 2012, the Plaintiff, who did not appeal to the Defendant, discharged the Defendant.
However, after discharge, after discharge, the Defendant gets out of the part of the Defendant’s medical procedure, and the Defendant received treatment, such as duplicating disinfection, from May 22, 2012 at the Plaintiff hospital. The details of treatment by each internal source are as follows.
Details of treatment.