1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant’s director D on April 9, 2012, between April 25, 2012 and April 24, 2015, designating the lease deposit as KRW 50 million, KRW 50,000, KRW 3,500,000, and KRW 3,500,000 as monthly rent, and around that time, the Plaintiff operated a restaurant with the account designated by D, by transferring the lease deposit amount to KRW 50,00,000 to KRW 50,000,000, while the lease agreement was concluded on April 20, 2015.

The defendant asserts that, since the defendant did not raise any specific objection until the lease term expires, the above lease contract is accepted and ratified, the defendant is obligated to return the lease deposit to the plaintiff.

On the other hand, the evidence presented by the plaintiff alone presented the right of attorney to conclude the above lease agreement with the plaintiff.

or to the plaintiff et al., it indicated that the power of representation related to the lease agreement should be granted to D.

It is insufficient to recognize that the act of unauthorized representation has been ratified, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and the plaintiff's assertion is without merit without further examination.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed for lack of reason.