1. Attached Form that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on August 14, 2018

2. Re-determination of partial disclosure of each information recorded in the partial disclosure list.

1. Indication of the disposition;

A. On August 5, 2016, the Plaintiff is confined in the Suwon Detention House and is confined in the Insdong Prison through the Insdong Prisons, the Insdong Prisons, and the Insdong Vocational Training Prisons, from September 20, 2018.

B. The Plaintiff attached Form to the Defendant on May 16, 2018

1. Each information recorded in the list (hereinafter “instant information”) was claimed to disclose the information.

According to the notice of decision on non-disclosure of information (Evidence A) (Evidence A), the Plaintiff filed a request for the disclosure of information of “the proposal to improve the system relating to the stamps of prisoners (2016, 2017, 2018),” but specified the information subject to disclosure as above.

C. On May 29, 2018, the Defendant rejected disclosure of the instant information to the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 9(1)4 and 5 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”).

On May 29, 2018, the Plaintiff made a non-disclosure decision in accordance with the Information Disclosure Act. However, after checking the details of the objection claimed by the Plaintiff in the complaint of administrative litigation, a thorough examination of the contents of the claim for information disclosure is conducted, the information disclosure shall be re-determined in accordance with Article 25 of the Administrative Procedures Act in order to verify the matters available for disclosure and to promote the improvement of

- Attached Form for improvement plan for the purchase of postage stamps for prisoners

2. "Information specified in paragraph (1) (b) of the partial disclosure list."

) The disclosure shall be made publicly, except the internal official text for the improvement of the correctional service, that may be misused (referring to the information set forth in (i), (ii), and (iii) of cases, etc. that would substantially impede the performance of their duties if disclosed in accordance with Article 9(1)4 of the Information Disclosure Act).

On June 20, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation against the Defendant to seek revocation of the above decision to refuse disclosure.

Accordingly, on August 14, 2018, the Defendant attached Form 1 to the Plaintiff as follows:

2. The information set out in paragraph 1 of the partial disclosure list shall not be disclosed, and 2.