1. The defendant's 4,677,704 won and 4,677,697 won and 4,677,697 won and 1 respectively to the plaintiff (Appointed Party)

1. Indication of claims: To be as shown in the grounds for claims in attached Form;

(However, the creditor is "the plaintiff," and the debtor is "the defendant," respectively). 2. Grounds for recognition: Evidence A 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings.

3. Determination as to the Defendant’s argument: The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff-designated party A succeeded to the obligation upon the acceptance of the business office rejected: The Defendant, in the situation where the business office was operated beyond the scope of another business office due to the difficulties in operating the business office around July 2018, the Plaintiff-designated party A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) agreed to the Plaintiff-designated party A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) to take over the instant business office and to assume the obligation of the designated party upon his/her succession, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this.

According to the data submitted by the Plaintiff, when the business office is closed after July 1, 2018 due to the Defendant’s non-payment of fees, the Plaintiff paid a temporary fixed fee to the designated actors for the stabilization of the livelihood of the home-based engineers and the continuous operation of the home-based business office.

Therefore, after that, the Plaintiff and the Selection G (the Defendant’s “self-type”), E, and the Defendant received all fees up to June 2018.

Even if such circumstance alone does not lead to the Defendant’s direct repayment of the obligations owed to the Plaintiff and the designated parties.

This is because the plaintiff was paid temporarily on behalf of the defendant.