A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 13, 2015, the Defendant, at around 14:40 on the street operated by the Defendant in the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, in order to control the illegal installation of the air line by F, a member of the social service personnel belonging to the office of the North-gu, Daegu-gu, and the North-gu, Daegu-gu Office, in order to get off a public vehicle. On the ground that F, the Defendant prevented F from doing so, he was tightly pushed down with f, and the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the illegal maintenance and control of the advertisements by social service personnel on one hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Statement in each police statement with respect to F and G;

1. Each description of a service schedule and a service certificate, a medical certificate for injury, and a written estimate;

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that each image of the video stored in the damaged mobile phone pictures, etc., the upper photograph, each photograph, each photograph, and black stuffed video CD [the defendant recognizes that the defendant gets bat of the victim's bat, but he does not have bather bather with bather, or bather with the hand floor with bather.

In other words, the following circumstances revealed by the above evidence, i.e., the F, “the Defendant was pushed down to the string of the string and the string of the string by the string of the string of the string.”

"........ the defendant has been deadly."

In the police investigation, “No. ” stated that “The Defendant was able to prevent the Defendant from leaving the string because he had drawn in, so the Defendant was satisfing with a dubling with a hand, and was satisfing on one occasion with his hand, was satisfing with the hand floor, and accordingly, the cell phone was damaged after facing the vehicle in which he performed his official duty while being pushed back.

“............. at the present site”

G makes a statement to the effect that it conforms to the above statement of the injured party in this Act and the police, and ③ at the time.