Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is living together for about four years with the victim C(66 years of age).

The relationship is the hedged relationship.

1. At around 19:00 on January 19, 2016, the injured Defendant unilaterally saw the victim as the E restaurant located in Guro-si, Guro-si, on November 11, 2015, and reported that the victim did not come to the above restaurant and did not come to contact to attend a meeting of the fraternity, and the victim did not talk separately to the above restaurant to attend the meeting. However, the victim was called as “hiner, hacker and hacker house,” and the victim was called as “hatd from the hacker, hacker house,” and hacked the victim’s hack, with the victim’s hack, with the victim’s breast part of the chest, with approximately two weeks’s fat, with the victim’s hacker’s chest, and carried out approximately two weeks’ s chest bee and fat, with the victim’s hack.

2. Around 10:00 on April 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assaulting the victim by reporting that the victim installed CCTV in his/her residence in order to kill the Defendant’s behavior by failing to take the victim’s residence (the victim’s H ownership); and (b) destroying the victim’s breath by debrising the bat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A criminal investigation report by the prosecution (to hear statements from the counter party of a stude);

1. A police investigation report (with respect to the investigation of the first telephone search for CCTV installed articles);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the upper part of the body;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel regarding the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order are the case in this case in order for the defendant to unilaterally seek dialogue with the victim by cutting down the relation unilaterally.