All judgment of the court below shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

1. The main points of the grounds for appeal are as follows: The punishment of the lower court (one year, each of the imprisonment of the lower court, No. 1, 2, and 3) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant ex officio shall be examined ex officio.

This Court decided to consolidate each appeal case against the judgment below and decided to hold the judgment below together, and each of the offenses against the judgment below is concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and shall be sentenced to a single sentence within the scope of a limited term of punishment pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act. Therefore, all of the judgment below should be reversed.

3. Accordingly, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing, and it is again decided as follows.

[Discied reasoning of the judgment] Criminal facts and summary of evidence recognized by the court is identical to each corresponding part of the judgment below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 5-4 (5) 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 5-4 (5) 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 330 of the Criminal Act, Article 5-4 (5) 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 342 and Article 330 of the Criminal Act, Article 342 and Article 330 of the Criminal Act, Article 5-4 (5) 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes against the crime, and selection

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Code for discretionary mitigation is that the Defendant had been punished three times for larceny, but the Defendant also has been punished for larceny, such as a church, miscellaneous store, unmanned store, etc.