The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a counselor at the college B and is a relationship with the victim C.

On August 25, 2013, from around 03:00 to 05:30 of the same day, the Defendant assaulted the victim by: (a) 503 of “EMel” located in Sinung-si Do, stating that the victim “B” was “B,” and, (b) doing so, making the victim’s humf in his hand humf and humbbbbb by hum so that he could not move into a canter; and (c) she could not move into a canter with his hand.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim C expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant on December 18, 2013, which is after the institution of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.