1. In relation to the accident described in the separate sheet, the damages liability of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is assessed.

1. The Plaintiff is in charge of the remaining island amusement park in 198, Namcheon-si, Namcheon-si, Namcheon-si, with a certain amount of fee collected from visitors.

On November 12, 2011, the Defendant visited an amusement park in South Island with his/her family members, and came to go behind the cash withdrawal of the national bank established at the center of the Central Bank of the Republic of Ghana to go up to the riverside due to the riverside, and then going to go behind the drinking vending machine.

원고는 위 길에 한 뼘 정도 높이의 낙엽더미를 만들어 두었는데, 피고는 낙엽더미 위를 걷다가 그 속에 있던 장작을 오른발로 밟고 넘어지는 사고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다)를 당하였다.

On the other hand, there was a small range of elevations in height on the back side of the above beverage vending machine, which is near the accident site of this case.

The Defendant suffered from the injury of “sacrine sacrine sacrine sacrine sacrine and sacrine sacrine” due to the instant accident; on November 15, 201, at the astronomical Materna Hospital of the National University, he/she received sacrine sacrine sacrine sacrines and sacrine sacrines,” and was hospitalized in the instant hospital from November 12, 201 to November 2

Currently, the treatment for the defendant is completed, but the defendant appeal for the physical disability and pain of the right satisfaction.

[Reasons for Recognition] A, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 (if a branch number is included in the number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8, or images of Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, and 8, or the body appraisal of the head of the Kuro University Hospital at Korea, the defendant asserts that the defendant cannot be trusted because the result of the physical appraisal entrustment to the head of Kuro University at Korea was based on the plaintiff's individual submission of materials favorable to himself/herself. However, the above assertion alone is insufficient to deem that there was a significant error or error in the result of the appraisal by the appraiser

The purport of all pleadings

2. The occurrence of liability for damages.