logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2020.10.16 2018가합103858
용역비
Text

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall pay 108,875,000 won to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the amount from October 23, 2017 to October 16, 2020.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

Basic Facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that operates an employment arrangement business, a human resources supply business, etc., and the Defendant is a company that runs a trucking transport business, a warehouse leasing business, etc.

B. On July 2017, the Plaintiff sent 20 necessary human resources, including short-term employees, to the instant center to provide the Defendant with human resources necessary for the work, such as freezing, freezing, freezing, packing, and field tea, and requested the Defendant to pay a total of KRW 11,584,914, on July 31, 2017. On August 22, 2017, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to pay a total of KRW 11,584,914 to the Defendant. The Defendant paid KRW 11,584,914 to the Plaintiff on August 22, 2017.

C. Since August 2017, the Plaintiff dispatched 56 human resources to the instant center from August 9, 2017 to August 31, 2017, 479 from September 1, 2017 to September 30, 2017, and 336 human resources from October 1, 2017 to October 22, 2017, at the request of the Defendant requesting to dispatch additional human resources, and suspended human resources supply by removing human resources dispatched from the instant center on October 23, 2017.

(hereinafter the contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant (hereinafter referred to as "the contract of this case"). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, each entry of Gap evidence, Gap evidence, 2, 4 through 6, 8, 10, 11, 14, 19 (including various numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), witness D's testimony, witness E's testimony, part of witness E's testimony, statement of the purport of the whole argument of parties

A. A. Around July 2017, Plaintiff 201 supplied the Defendant with daily workers calculated as KRW 125,000 per capita, and even thereafter, concluded a human resources supply contract with the Defendant to supply the regular employees of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff at the Defendant’s request, and subsequently continued to supply the human resources from August 9, 2017 to October 22, 2017, but did not receive the service payment from the Defendant.

Therefore, the Defendant, from August 2017 to October 2017, has human resources to the Defendant, totaling KRW 123,747,500, and labor cost.

arrow