1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. The plaintiff asserts that since the plaintiff supplied the defendant with goods equivalent to KRW 9.9 million in relation to electrical construction, the defendant should pay the price for the goods.

In this regard, the defendant asserts that no contract for goods supply with the plaintiff was concluded, and that the plaintiff's request cannot be complied with because the executor has not received the construction cost related to the electrical construction.

2. Determination

A. The judgment on the cause of the claim was made from September 24, 2015 to February 22, 2016 that the Plaintiff manufactured and sold lighting equipment, etc. supplied to the Defendant with an exhaustr, ELD lighting, etc. for the electrical construction at the construction site of the Magjin-gun Office Model Construction Project (hereinafter “instant construction”). The Defendant was confirmed as to the supply of this case’s construction cost, including the price of the goods supplied by the Plaintiff to the Defendant who was not the Plaintiff, and the specifications of the instant construction project confirmed by the ELSD Development Corporation, the enforcement company, included the goods supplied by the Plaintiff. The Defendant did not receive a total of KRW 19,80,000 (including value added tax, hereinafter the same shall apply) from the Plaintiff on July 25, 2016, and the Plaintiff did not receive any specific dispute between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on the purchase of the instant goods and the Plaintiff on July 23, 2016.