A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a ‘Ddac' as a resting restaurant in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

A resting restaurant business operator shall not engage in any act allowing customers to drink alcohol within his/her business facilities.

Nevertheless, around July 17, 2016, the Defendant provided 4,000 won per cans to three customers who are not customers, and provided 4,000 won per trademark in the above restaurant, so that they may drink alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Investigation reports and internal investigation reports (related to drinking beverages that are at the site);

1. Business registration certificate and business registration certificate;

1. On-the-spot photograph Defendant asserts that, at the time, beverages provided to customers at the time are “202 CEUS”, which is an unrelated alcohol beer, they did not allow customers to drink alcohol.

According to each of the above evidence, the Defendant was equipped with 2002 CEUS, a carbon beverage on the multiple air conditioners operated by the Defendant. On the day of the instant case, the police officer E received 112 reports to sell alcoholic beverages on the said multiple roads, and sent to the said multiple houses. The above multiple customers were drunkly discharged, and the table was 3 of the glass residues contained in beer, and the foregoing 2002 CEUS beverage cans or other alcoholic beverages were not found together, and the Defendant was sent to the police officer, and the Defendant was found to have been found to have been found to have been found to have been determined as a result of a measurement of drinking by inserting the police officer to check the contents of glass residues on the floor of the above glass, and after measuring the content of drinking.

According to the above facts, if the defendant sold carbon beverages, the police officer's control over police officers, such as putting the cans of tables at the time of the police officer's control, or putting the beer, etc.