beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
All of the applicants for compensation are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles did not have agreed to pay the full amount of contributions or money in excess thereof in the future, and the character of money that the Defendant agreed to pay is not only the agreed amount but also the service cost for the side business. Thus, the Defendant’s act does not constitute an act
Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
B. The sentence of unfair sentencing (two years and six months of imprisonment and four years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. 1) Determination of misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles: (a) The defendant asserted the same purport as this part of the appeal at the court below; and (b) the court below rejected the argument in detail with the decision of the court below. In light of the records and a thorough review of the judgment of the court below, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable (in selling sos to the victims, no compensation is paid, such as the transaction of goods, etc., in the sale of sosing, the defendant did not pay for the purchase of sos, and the defendant expressed that "DN" Internet homepage and the 150,000 won survey per day, to pay money equivalent to three times the principal amount for 26 months." It is clear that the victims entered into a prus purchase contract on the premise of this, and in light of the fact that the victims entered into a contract for sos on, and other contents of services or the degree of profits generated therefrom, it is evident that the defendant's act agreed to provide the victims with the payment of money in excess of the amount of investment or money in the future.
(2) There is no error of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, such as the defendant's assertion.