A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:20 on May 20, 2019, the Defendant filed a report on 112 during his residence B apartment C, and scambling with G’s fingers to listen to the circumstances of the instant case by the police box affiliated with the same police station, such as the slope E, which was called to the site after having received the report of 112 during his dispute with G on May 20, 2019.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. G statements;

1. One copy of a closure photograph of a Baduk camp;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes 1 to a investigative report (verification of on-site images), a bar scopic photograph;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. On the grounds of suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the following conditions of sentencing are considered: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime were committed, and the sentence is determined as ordered.

- The risk of the act - The same kind and suspension of qualifications or more