logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.03.24 2016가단29144
제3자이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s enforcement of the Incheon District Court Branch Decision 2016 Ghana8738 Decided September 22, 2016 with respect to C.

Reasons

In full view of the purport of evidence Nos. 1 through 15, the defendant filed a service payment claim lawsuit against C, and received a favorable judgment under the Incheon District Court Branch Decision 2016Gaso8738, Sept. 22, 2016 (hereinafter "the judgment of this case"), the defendant applied for compulsory execution based on the executory exemplification of the judgment of this case, and the execution officer of this court attached each object listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the compulsory execution of this case") on December 14, 2016, the fact that each object listed in the separate sheet is owned by the plaintiff or the plaintiff's mother, and considering these facts in light of the purport of the entire pleadings, it is reasonable to deny the compulsory execution of this case since the defendant was also subject to the third party ownership of this case.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow