Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for six months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstructing the exercise of rights in the Gwangju District Court's wooden branch on July 15, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 15, 2017.

Defendant A, from January 2010 to April 2010, is a person who operated (State)C, and Defendant B is a person who actually operates (State)C from May 2014.

Defendant

On July 17, 2013, A received a loan of KRW 50 million from the victim (owner)E to the above C Office located in Yong-gun, Yong-gun, Yong-gun, and created a mortgage between the mortgagee, debtor (owner), debtor C, claim value of KRW 18 million for the above loan, mortgagee, debtor (owner), debtor, debtor, claim value of the mortgage value of KRW 19 million for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the for the

Defendant

B From May 2014, when running the above C on behalf of Defendant A from around May 2014, in order to obtain reimbursement of KRW 70,000,000 to Defendant A with its profits, but did not make profits, B had been able to provide the above holding vehicles with the mortgage as collateral to the credit service provider and to receive the claim by borrowing money.

Defendant

B around August 13, 2014, at the close page of the I apartment, the defendant A prepared a power of attorney to dispose of the above for the above for the above for the above for the above for the defendant A, and the defendant A knowingly accepted the above for the above for the above for the defendant A, prepared a power of attorney, and provided the above for the above for the above for the above for the loan service provider by the defendant B.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to conceal the goods of Defendant A, which was the object of the victim company’s rights, thereby hindering the victim’s exercise of rights.

Defendant A of the 2019 Highest 271 is the victim J (Woo, 31 years of age) and the person who had been in an internal relationship from August 2016.

1. The defendant A of intimidation is the defendant A of 2016.