1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The B building in the Jeonju-si Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) is an aggregate building of approximately twenty-three divided stores subject to sectional ownership, an underground first floor consisting of a total floor area of about 3,351.28 square meters, and an aggregate of the six stories above ground, and the Plaintiff is a sectional owner of the first floor of the instant commercial building.

B. The Defendant is an organization consisting of occupants for the management of the instant commercial building and revitalization of commercial buildings, and the Plaintiff was the Defendant’s president from July 1, 2001 to April 201.

C. On September 12, 2014, the Defendant publicly announced the convocation of an extraordinary general meeting against the sectional owners and lessees of the instant commercial building, a member of the Defendant, by holding an extraordinary general meeting on the second floor of the instant building on September 16, 2014, and resolved as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant resolution”) . Not - The toilet remodeling work shall be implemented with two floors per year.

- 20,000 won per commercial building for a period of 3 years to cover the construction cost.

(Provided, That this principle shall apply to the cost of construction. - Direct processing shall be made to reduce the cost of construction.

On December 30, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant C, the representative of the time, under the suspicion of occupational breach of trust, etc., but C was subject to a non-prosecution disposition on December 30, 2014, on the following grounds: “The Plaintiff, while granting a special charge, did not impose a fair charge depending on the area of the commercial building, imposed 20,000 won at the same time on the previous commercial building, causing property damage to the petty members; and in order to impose a special charge, a majority of the total members should attend the general meeting, and unilaterally imposed a special charge without such procedures.

E. C removed from the instant building, and the Defendant elected D’s representative on February 25, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 6, 7, and Eul No. 1 to 4.