(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.10.24 2014고합206

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.10.24 2014고합206

강간

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 22:00 on November 8, 2013, the Defendant contacted the victim E (n, female, and age 42) who was aware of his knowledge in Ulsan-gu C, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, to “Igsan-do have made a trip to Ulsan-do,” and asked the victim to go to the victim’s own accommodation and to arrive at the Gel in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, by using the victim’s vehicle.

At around 02:10 on November 9, 2013, the Defendant offered to the victim that “the fester of the fatus fatus fataata” was entered into the said fat507 fata at the same time, and fatd the victim who attempted to go from the fata at the fata.

Therefore, when the victim refused to see the defendant's tightly, boomed the defendant's hand and "I must go on the house only," the defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim once, since the victim could not resist the victim by putting the victim on the bed, kids by putting the victim on the bed, putting the victim's breath and clothes, putting the victim's breath by other hand, putting the victim's breath and clothes, putting the victim's breath away from the bed from the bed, putting the victim's breath of the victim's bridge, taking the victim's bridge toward her own bridge, brea the victim's bridge

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The prosecutor's interrogation protocol on the accused (the accused and the defense counsel have a sexual intercourse against the victim's explicit intent, but the accused has not committed violence and intimidation to the extent that the victim's resistance may be prevented, as well as the sexual intercourse with the victim's implied consent. However, the victim's consistent and detailed statement (the victim intends to leave the room, and the defendant was prevented and placed on the bed, and the victim was forced to have sexual intercourse even though the victim attempted to interfere with the defendant, and the defendant was forced to have sexual intercourse with the police and the prosecutor's office.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2015.04.17 2014고합538

-대전지방법원 2018.04.27 2017고합445

-서울북부지방법원 2015.02.06 2014고합307

-서울서부지방법원 2020.11.25 2020고정974

-서울남부지방법원 2016.05.12 2015고합489