logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.11.09 2017고단1267
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 8, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on December 8, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Kimcheon Juvenile Prison on August 10, 2017.

1. Around August 26, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime around 10:00 on August 26, 2017, at the health source of the victim D (73 tax) located in Kimcheon-si C around 10:00 on August 26, 2017, the Defendant considered the victim as “this rings.”

(d) For reporting:

The victim’s health source operation work was obstructed by force by avoiding disturbance over about 40 minutes, such as talking in a large sound, thereby preventing customers from entering the said health source.

2. On August 26, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime at around 13:40 on August 26, 2017, at the place indicated in the preceding port on August 26, 2017, and obstructed the operation of the victim’s health source by force by avoiding disturbance over about 15 minutes, such as cutting down the above health source again on the ground that the victimized person reported the Defendant to the Defendant at 112, and neglecting the operation of the victim’s health source by putting in front of the entrance and leaving the entrance and leaving the entrance and leaving the entrance so as to prevent the customers from entering the health source.

The Defendant, around 08:30 on August 26, 2017, “G seeds” operated by the Victim F in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si on August 26, 2017, expressed the victim’s desire without any justifiable reason, and “hump, fump, fump, and 6 months.”

“Along 30 minutes of the disturbance, such as intending to fluorize the cushion containing the shoulder, so that the disturbance was avoided, thereby getting the customers who had been on the said store to leave.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 1267"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of the police with H, D, and H;

1. On-site photographs, internal reports (the details of reports and site conditions at the time of dispatch);

arrow