beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 19, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a special injury by the Seoul Northern District Court, and the execution of the sentence was completed on April 10, 2018 at the Seoul Eastern Detention Center.
1. A person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-compliances after an accident) is a person engaged in driving duties of 125CC without registration.
At around 22:20 on October 8, 2018, the Defendant driven the above Oralba, and proceeded three-lanes of the fifth line road in front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, in the direction of the Young Fence distance from the direction of C University.
Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the steering gear and brakes in accordance with the signals to the person engaged in off-to-land driving service, and driving well the right and the right of the front, and safely.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, due to the negligence of proceeding with the vehicle driving signal even though it was red, and the front part of the EYF-R3 Obane driven by the victim D (the age of 24) who was driving in the direction of the city survey triangulation distance in the direction of the blue-ri station according to the time signal was driven by the victim D (the age of 24). As a result, the victim FY-R3 Obane exceeded the victim D YF-R3 Oba, thereby making the front part of the G bus driven by the victim F who was driving.
Accordingly, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, such as “satisf salted satisf,” which requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s DYF-R3 Oral YF-R7,970 won, and 220,000 won of the repair cost of the victim FG bus, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.
2. The Defendant, who violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, did not subscribe to mandatory insurance as a holder of Batoba mentioned in paragraph (1).