logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.11.09 2017나2075621
물품대금
Text

1. The part concerning the principal lawsuit in the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid.

Reasons

1. Facts recognized;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures female clothes, etc.

(2) The Defendant is a company that supplies some of design and original parts to manufacturers, such as clothes for women, and sells them after being supplied with finished products manufactured accordingly.

From February 2015, the Defendant supplied the clothes for women under the trademark of "C" sold through N’s D broadcasting from February 2015 to N (hereinafter “N”).

B. The details of the supply contract and the product name of Article 1(S) of the Implementation of the Supply Contract: A P model such as O such as Class 5 and Q, and T model 5 such as S, and PAD unit value added tax are not included.

Unless otherwise indicated, the same shall apply.

The amount of KRW 48,00: Total 170,000: The amount of KRW 170,000 for the first time of December 18, 2015 and the second time of December 24, 2015 may be changed under mutual agreement between the Defendant and the Plaintiff on the following basis:

Article 2 (In principle, the Plaintiff shall procure and use raw and secondary materials according to the Defendant's production instruction in manufacturing products.

Article 3 through 5) Article 6 (Inspection)

1. The plaintiff shall complete the inspection of the products produced by the defendant or the person or agency designated by the defendant, and shall provide all preparations and convenience for inspection.

2. Standards for external inspection of products shall meet the defendant's standards for inspection;

3. (Omission) Article 7 (Disposal of Disqualified Products)

1. The products produced shall be classified into Grade A that can be shipped normally in accordance with the Defendant’s inspection criteria and Grade B that cannot be shipped normally in good condition.

2. In principle, the Plaintiff shall dispose of the rejected goods, and may not remove any LBEL and TAG even if they are removed.

Article 8 (Omission)

1. The delivery of products shall be made to the extent that the products passed the inspection of the Defendant are to be made up of five pande 5 pande pande 5 pande 5 pande 1 pande spande 1 pande; and

Products which do not constitute sets shall be supplied.

arrow