The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Punishment of the crime

On January 11, 2012, at around 19:30, the Defendants: (a) put a drama in the locking device of the entrance, opened a gate, opened two computers located in the entrance; and (b) cut off the two computers located in the entrance; and (c) caused two parts, such as the two merads, two merads, two luad disks, and two luds, etc. in the market price. Accordingly, the Defendants, together, stolen the victim’s property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of each of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes (the Defendants)

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Six months of imprisonment to be suspended;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (the fact that there is no history of criminal punishment, and the defendant's students agreed that the formation of the assistant principal of the victimized school, the assistant principal of the victimized school, and the guidance of the parents at the time of committing the crime, and that the defendants do not want to be punished.

Taking into account the origin of the project and the reflection of the project;